Comments on: Tony Fernandes, AirAsia, Labu and KLIA East

By: wenkt

wenkt — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 01:02:53 +0000

projek rm1.6bil ini ditolak kerajaan.

kami dalam proses membuat rayuan.

By: pcuserz

pcuserz — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:26:57 +0000

“pennywise poundfoolish”
just think about it.

By: titan

titan — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:39:40 +0000

tambah lot parking ajela..aku datang aritue. kena cari parking lebih setengah jam. itupun tunggu kete blah dr situ, barulah ada..

By: ikram

ikram — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:35:33 +0000

It seems they want loads of parking lots /huge terminal and not satisfied with the way MAB building them. Instead of new airport, perhaps they should consider (AA/Sime Darby) building new terminal or runaway within vast KLIA compound. This should be a win-win situation, to AA and MAB.

By: Sweet Thinker

Sweet Thinker — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:57:12 +0000

tony datang kelate je la buat epot tue. 26 penerbangan sehari utk negeri yg tidak maju. apekah? haha. negeri2 len no komen la sbb akoo geram, negeri yg hanya bwh 10 penerbangan sehari leh jadikan epot nk g makkah? mengarut. politik!!!

By: Sweet Thinker

Sweet Thinker — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:54:32 +0000

garang bertempat. xkesah!

By: Sweet Thinker

Sweet Thinker — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:53:43 +0000

hebat la ko. jadi penasihat wenkt. kendian jd penasihat terminat tony yg SWOT die lom kasik akoo lg.

By: Adila

Adila — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 20:43:15 +0000

..tak cukup lapangan terbang lagi ke?
just how many of us travel by plane each week that we need another airport? (or should i say.. kapal terbang cepat buruk aka xbley jalan ke sampai nak byk2? hohoho)
so ridiculous!

how about if they, make the KTM (now swasta but still the same name, right? i’m lazy to google lol) a better one?
i mean.. airplane! how cheap is cheap enough??!!
booking months in advance? like what.. you know when you’re gonna travel just like that?

better instead of another lapangan terbang, make more of the LRT, KTM (whatever name) to all over Malaysia instead!
why must have another airport if they can upgrade the public transport instead?
airplanes, cars, buses, trains.. why must airplanes be the main thing?

By: |1f34|-|1r3

|1f34|-|1r3 — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:30:43 +0000

bro…comment ko ada la..dia lambat approve kot..siap Tony Airasia bagi comment lg…mmg tak leh blah…secara otomatik nyer aku dapat email Tony Fernandes n aku tahu dia guna streamyx jugak…haha

By: |1f34|-|1r3

|1f34|-|1r3 — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:26:31 +0000

fuh arep…lama aku tak jumpa ko…muakkakakka…ntah ko ingat lagi ke tak aku nii…wenkt mmg suka berangan !

By: NoktahHitam

NoktahHitam — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:18:58 +0000

Either he deleted my comment or it was never sent properly. Oh well..

By: NoktahHitam

NoktahHitam — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:34:25 +0000

Die jual roti je, susah la nak main crony2 dgn bakery.

By: bongkersz

bongkersz — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:20:35 +0000

Orang tue tu… bangkang sebab ini ‘satu lagi projek dari Khairy and gang!’. Itu jer..

By: NoktahHitam

NoktahHitam — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:17:00 +0000

Mind you, I don’t like writing in great details. It’ll bore my readers. PFI.. from EPF? Can you profiteer from Airport tax? Get real. No.

By: bongkersz

bongkersz — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:07:09 +0000

“From my understanding, the new airport is private funding initiative (PFI) hence does not touch any of the tax payers money. ”

It is disguised that way, so it appears that we, the clueless taxpayers will not need to pay a cent for the airport. Don’t fall for the canggih acrunym of ‘private finance initiative’. Privatisation? More like ‘piratisation’. Half baked truth.

Private companies are not charities, someone will need to pay back all these investment monies one day, most probably taxpayers.

It will be impossible that such an airport project of this size will not involve tax payers’ money. Police, Immigration, Custom and Aviation officers will have to be stationed at KLIA-East. Who is going to pay? These are civil servants, for sure taxpayers pay (again)..

How about the maintenance of the airport?Who is going to pay for that? Taxpayers, no doubt.

A low cost carrier terminal is meant to serve low budget travellers, who want to spend as little as possible to get to their final destination.

Studies will indicate that the majority of these travellers come from the Klang valley, which means that getting to Labu by taxi or bus may cost even more than the airfare itself. What a joke!

I always find this ‘low cost carrier’ implementation a bit of a joke. If it’s really no frills service, the Mc Donald at LCCT should offer same pricing at the Mc Donalds at the town, and the food price on board should be really cheap, then only you can call it ‘cheap travel’. Ahaks!

KLIA is capable to handle up to 100 million passengers based on its development plan. Currently, it is still lagging behind in the number of passengers, less than 50 million passengers. We (the people of Malaysia) have already invested RM10 billion into this KLIA facility. And we need another airport?

Public’s funds may not be at stake, but the nation’s interests are.